Home

Public Others Government Business Arts Community
Entertainment Lifestyle Services People Travel Internet Stuff

 

 

     FrontPage Edition: Wed 30 Nov 2005

Weather: Meteorological Service Singapore    High & Low Tides

Yesterday   2005   2004   2003   2002   2001   2000   1999

Nguyen Tuong Van Case: Separating Fact From Fiction

 

Source: www.mfa.gov.sg

Op-ed piece by Singapore High Commissioner in Canberra, Mr Joseph Koh: "Separating Fact from Fiction"

SEPARATING FACT FROM FICTION
Although opinions in Australia are not unanimous, many Australians strongly oppose Singapore's decision not to commute the death sentence on Mr Nguyen Tuong Van for drug trafficking.
I respect these views, which spring from a deep sense of human compassion. However, the outcry has also made it difficult to separate fact from fiction.
Fiction #1: "Singapore has breached international law"
There is no international agreement to abolish the death penalty. Capital punishment remains part of the criminal justice systems of 76 countries, including in the United States of America where it is practised in 36 states.
We respect Australia's sovereign choice not to have capital punishment. We hope Australia will likewise respect Singapore's sovereign choice to impose the death penalty for the most serious crimes, including drug trafficking. The overwhelming majority of Singaporeans support this.
Fiction #2: "The death penalty has not deterred drug trafficking"
This logic is flawed. The death penalty has not completely eliminated drug trafficking, but it has certainly deterred drug trafficking. Since the introduction of tough anti-drug laws in the mid-70's, drug trafficking and drug abuse in Singapore have come down significantly. Potential traffickers know that, once arrested, they face the full weight of the law.
Fiction #3: "Mr Van Nguyen is an unsuspecting victim"
Mr Nguyen may not be a hardened criminal, but he is not an unsuspecting victim either. He knew what he was doing and the penalty if caught. Had he succeeded, he would have made a lot of money.
If we let off a convicted courier because of age, financial difficulties or distressed family background, it will only make it easier for drug traffickers to recruit more "mules", with the assurance that they will escape the death penalty.
Fiction #4: "The punishment does not fit crime"
Mr Nguyen was caught with 396 grams of pure heroin, enough for 26,000 "hits", worth a street value of more than A$1,000,000.
Yes, he was transiting Singapore, and not smuggling drugs into the country, but Singapore simply cannot afford to allow itself to become a transit hub for illicit drugs in the region.
Fiction #5: "Mr Van Nguyen can testify against Mr Bigs"
All drug syndicates assume that some of their couriers will get caught. They never let the couriers know enough to incriminate themselves. The information that Mr Nguyen provided to the Singapore authorities was of limited value, and was in fact intended to mislead and delay the investigation.
Fiction #6: "Singapore connives with drug lords"
This is an old falsehood propagated by Dr Chee Soon Juan. He has alleged that the Singapore Government had invested in projects in Myanmar that supported the drug trade.
When this first surfaced in 1996, the Singapore Government explained its investment in the Myanmar Fund was completely open and above board.
The Fund held straightforward commercial investments in hotels and companies. Other investors in the Fund included Coutts & Co, an old British bank, and the Swiss Bank Corporation. The Singapore Government offered to set up a Commission of Inquiry so that Dr Chee could produce evidence to prove his wild allegations. Unfortunately, Dr Chee never took up the offer.
Fiction #7: "Singapore has treated Australia with contempt"
Singapore highly values good relations with Australia and with Australian leaders. We share a common belief in the sanctity of the law.
The Singapore Cabinet deliberated at length Mr Nguyen's clemency petition. It considered all relevant factors, including Mr Nguyen's personal circumstances, and the many public and private appeals from Australian leaders.
Unfortunately, finally the Cabinet decided that it could not justify making an exception for Mr Nguyen. It had to treat Mr Nguyen consistently with similar past cases, and apply the law equally to Singaporeans and foreigners.
Singapore's leaders have taken pains to explain our decision to Australian leaders, both in writing and in person. Singapore's Foreign Minister had also informed FM Downer confidentially in advance of when the family would be notified of the execution date, and explained to Mr Downer that that the family should be the first to learn of the execution date.
So when the Singapore Prime Minister met PM John Howard in Busan, he could not inform PM Howard of the execution date either. PM Lee did not know that the letter of notification had by mistake already been delivered to Mrs Nguyen, one day early. Once Mr Lee discovered what had happened, he promptly apologised to Mr Howard.
In Conclusion
Australians who oppose the death sentence on Mr Nguyen will not agree with everything I have said. But I hope they will accept that the Singapore government has a responsibility to protect the many lives that would otherwise be blighted and destroyed by the drug syndicates, and to prevent Singapore from becoming a conduit for illicit drugs in the region.
We are all touched by the pain and anguish of Mr Nguyen's mother, but if we waver in our firm position against drug trafficking, many more families will be shattered.
Joseph K H Koh
Singapore High Commissioner in Australia
More..... (Singapore High Commissioner in Canberra's Letters to Major Australian Dailies)

Source: www.mfa.gov.sg Press Release 30 Nov 2005

Related Article:
EXECUTION OF CONVICTED DRUG TRAFFICKER
Nguyen Tuong Van was charged for importation of 396.2 grams of diamorphine or pure heroin into Singapore, under Section 7 of the Misuse of Drugs Act (Chapter 185), which carries the death penalty. Mr Nguyen was convicted as charged and sentenced to death. The Misuse of Drugs Act provides that the death penalty is mandatory if the amount of diamorphine or pure heroin imported exceeds 15g. Mr Nguyen unlawfully brought into Singapore almost 400 grams of diamorphine, enough to supply 26,000 doses of heroin to drug addicts. The street value of the heroin was worth an estimated S$1.3m. Mr Nguyen failed in his appeals to the Court of Appeal and to the President for clemency. The sentence was carried out this morning at Changi Prison.
Ministry of Home Affairs
2 Dec 05
Source: www.gov.sg Press Release 2 Dec 2005
 

Important Notice

Our FrontPage Editions are a historical record of our Web site and reflect the changing of the times, and also of our Web site through time. We do not and will not update the links and stories on these FrontPages even if they have become obsolete.

 

If you have an event or some news to share with our readers, send the details, including picture(s), to us at editor@getforme.com 

We are now 9216 pages thick and growing.

Public Holidays CHRISTMAS DAY is the next public holiday. It falls on 25 December 2005.